On Lafayette Baker
Lafayette Baker was born on 13th October, 1826. The family moved to Michigan but Baker left home in 1848 and did a variety of different jobs in the West. In 1856 he joined the Vigilance Command that cleaned up San Francisco following the Californian Gold Rush. During this period he was involved in several lynchings.(1) Description of
Lafayette Baker that appeared in George Alfred Townsend's book, Life, Crime
and Capture of John Wilkes Booth (1865)
Baker has a hard and grizzly face. His inconsiderable forehead
is crowned with turning sandy hair, and the deep concave of its insatiate jaws
is almost hidden by a dense red beard, which cannot still abate the terrible
decision of the large mouth, so well sustained by searching eyes of spotted
grey, which roll and rivet one.
(2) L. E. Chittenden,
Recollections of President Lincoln (1891)
Baker took into his service men who claimed to
have any aptitude for detective work, without recommendation, investigation,
or any inquiry, beyond his own inspection. How large his regiment ultimately
grew is uncertain, but at one time he asserted that it exceeded two thousand
men.
With this force at his command, protected against interference from the judicial
authorities, Baker became a law unto himself. He instituted a veritable Reign
of Terror. He dealt with every accused person in the same manner; with a reputable
citizen as with a deserter or petty thief. He did not require the formality
of a written charge, it was quite sufficient for any person to suggest to Baker
that a citizen might be doing something that was against law.
Corruption spread like a contagious disease, wherever the operations of these
detectives extended. Honest manufacturers and dealers, who paid their taxes,
were pursued without mercy for the most technical breaches of the law, and were
quickly driven out of business. The dishonest rapidly accumulated wealth, which
they could well afford to share with their protectors.
(3) In his book, History of the Secret Service, Colonel
Lafayette Baker described hearing about the assassination of President Abraham
Lincoln from
Edwin Stanton.
As I entered the Secretary's office,
and he recognized me, he turned away to hide his tears. He remarked - "Well,
Baker, they have now performed what they have long threatened to do; they have
killed the President.
(4) Albert
G. Riddle, Lafayette Baker's lawyer, wrote about the capture of the conspirators
in his book, Recollections of War Times (1895)
Baker's intuitive grasp of the conditions of the case made
it certain that the assassins would seek cover in Virginia. Before the starting
of the search party, the Chief spread out a map of Virginia and designed the
crossing-place of the fugitives and the place where they had probably landed;
then, taking a compass, he placed one point at Port Conway, where a road crossed
the Rappahannock, and drew a circle, which he said included a space of ten miles
around the point, and within that territory they would find the fugitives. The
fugitives were captured within Baker's circle.
(5) Lafayette Baker, History of the Secret Service (1867)
On 24th April there was brought to my headquarters a colored
man, who I was informed had important information respecting the assassins.
On questioning the colored man I found he had seen two men, answering the description
of Booth and Harrold, entering a small boat in the vicinity of Swan's Point.
This information, with my preconceived theory as to the movements of the assassins,
decided my course.
(6) Lafayette
Baker, History of the Secret Service (1867)
Fletcher learned that two suspicious characters had just
crossed the Navy Yard Bridge on horseback. He returned to General Augur's headquarters
about one o'clock on Saturday morning, and reported the fact. Here begins the
first series of blunders in this attempted search for the assassins. Fletcher's
statement was entirely disregarded. No steps were taken by those in possession
of this information to follow up the clue this given until sixteen hours afterward.
This delay enabled the assassins to get entirely beyond the reach of those sent
in pursuit.
(7)
Benjamin Butler, speech
in Congress about the diary of
John Wilkes
Booth (1867)
That diary, as now produced, had eighteen
pages cut out, the pages prior to the time when Abraham Lincoln was massacred,
although the edges as yet show they had all been written over. Now, what I want
to know, was that diary whole? Who spoliated that book?
(8) Colonel Lafayette Baker was interviewed by a Congress committee about the
state of the diary of
John Wilkes
Booth when he handed it over to
Edwin Stanton,
the Secretary of War (2nd April, 1867)
Q: Do you mean to say at the time you
gave the book to the Secretary of War there were no leaves gone?
A. I do.
Q. That is still your opinion?
A. That is still my opinion.
Q. Did you examine it pretty carefully?
A. I examined the book, and I am very sure that if any leaves had been gone
I should have noticed it.
Q. Did you examine it carefully?
A. It did not require careful examination to discover the absence of so many
leaves.
(9)
Otto Eisenchiml,
Why Was Lincoln Murdered? (1937)
The man who died at Garrett's Farm was stripped
of his belongings before he was dead. The things that were taken from him were
of no great consequence, with the sole exception of a diary in which he had
written some declamatory descriptions of his experiences and sentiments. This
diary was subsequently to become the centre of a fiery controversy, not so much
because of its contents as because it had been kept hidden from the public.
For two years the little volume lay locked up in the archives of the War Office.
In the meantime Baker had been dismissed and had written his book, The History
of the Secret Service. Therein repeated references were made to Booth's
diary, creating a sensation in all circles. The judiciary committee of the House,
then in session, seized upon the item with alacrity, and bade Baker take the
stand and repeat his statements under oath. There the detective exploded another
bombshell: the the diary had been mutilated since it had been taken from the
body at Garrett's Farm.
(10)
Lafayette G. Baker wrote a report on the assassination
of
Abraham Lincoln
in code in a bound edition of Colburn's United Services Magazine. It
was found and deciphered by Roy Neff in 1960.
It was on the 10th April, 1865, when I
first knew that the plan was in action. I did not know the identity of the assassin,
but I knew most all else when I approached Edwin Stanton about it. He at once
acted surprised and disbelieving. Later he said: "You are a party to it too.
Let us wait and see what comes of it and then we will know better how to act
in the matter." I soon discovered what he meant that I was a party to it when
the following day I was shown a document that I knew to be a forgery but a clever
one, which made it appear that I had been in charge of a plot to kidnap the
President, the Vice-President being the instigator. Then I became a party to
that deed even though I did not care to.
There were at least eleven members of Congress involved in the plot, no less
than twelve Army officers, three Naval officers and at least twenty-four civilians,
of which one was a governor of a loyal state. Five were bankers of great repute,
three were nationally known newspapermen and eleven were industrialists of great
repute and wealth. Eighty-five thousand dollars were contributed by the named
persons to pay for the deed. Only eight persons knew the details of the plot
and the identity of the others. I fear for my life.
(11) David Balsiger and Charles E. Sellier, The
Lincoln Conspiracy (1977)
Colonel Lafayette Baker
threatened to expose those involved in the plot against Lincoln and
attempts were made on his life to silence him. In addition to newspaper
reports of such attacks, Mrs. Jenny Baker's diary treats them at length.
On January 2, 1868, Mrs. Baker writes, "Lafe's shoulder is healing but
he complains of soreness. He'd been shot at just before Christmas.
Splinters hit him in the shoulder.
On January 3, the diary
records, "Lafe cancelled the hunting trip he, Tom and Wally had planned.
Lafe does not sleep, but walks the floor all night."
"Wally" is
Walter Pollack, Baker's brother-in-law, who was still a detective for
the War Department. Baker and Pollock had married sisters. Because of
the family relationship, "Wally" was not suspected of having been sent
to recover Baker's confidential War Department papers.
"Wally,
Mary, Lafe and I went to the Rathskeller for dinner. We got home about8
and Lafe was sick."
By chemical analywho was still a detective for
the War Department. Baker and Pollock had married sisters. Because of
the family relationship, "Wally" was not suspected of having been sent
to recover Baker's confidential War Department papers.
"Wally,
Mary, Lafe and I went to the Rathskeller for dinner. We got home about8
and Lafe was sick."
By chemical analysis of a lock of Baker's
hair, acquired with Mrs. Baker's diary, Dr. Ray A. Neff has determined
that Baker had been slowly killed by arsenic poisoning resulting from
his beer laced with it.
This page mirrored from http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/USAbakerLaf.htm